Recently, social networks “got excited” because of information about a first grade student sitting and watching his friends having a party because his mother did not pay the parent fund. Today, a representative of the Ministry of Education and Training informed that the unit is requesting related information.
According to a representative of the Ministry of Education and Training, the unit was forced to verify information related to the incident because after the press reported, there were many mixed opinions while it was unclear what the truth was.
“The Ministry of Education and Training will review and capture the information and if it is true, in which area, in which school and in which classroom will it require specific reporting,” this person said.
After verification, the unit will have official information to the press and public opinion.
Recently, information appeared on social networks that a parent “accused” his first grade child of not being able to have a party because the mother did not pay the parent fund. According to content posted on social networks, this parent angrily said: “I pay for the class fund, but I don’t pay for the association fund because it is an optional fee, anyone who wants can pay. Yet there were 31 students in the class having a party, plus the homeroom teacher and the English teacher and 3 parents handing out meals, yet my child was left alone to watch everyone celebrate happily.”
Also on social networks, this mother said that the association fund was an agreed-upon amount, not mandatory, so she did not pay it.
And the class has a class of 32 students, but during the party, the parents only bought 31 meals for the children, 1 child did not have any. The reason is that this child’s parents did not pay the 100,000 VND parent fund. The opinion is said to be from parents in the class 1C chat group.
The opinion is said to be from parents in the class 1C chat group.
According to the class fund settlement information of the Parents’ Committee, during the school year parents pay 100 thousand VND and only 31 parents participate. 1 parent does not participate in contributing to this fund. Combined with another parent’s donation of 300,000 VND, the total fund is 2,682,000 VND.
After spending the second semester, the fund had 1,789,000 VND left, so the class’s Parent Committee decided to buy 31 meals including fried chicken, potatoes, and sausages for the students in the class. The remainder will reward and encourage students at the end of the year.
After this parent “accused” the parents and teachers board on social networks, in the class 1C parent chat group, someone spoke up and explained: There are 2 revenues including the class fund and the parent fund. Initially, the other parent refused to pay the 100,000 VND parent fund.
And before the party, the Parents’ Committee announced it, but the mother had no opinion, and immediately spoke up to “claim her rights”. “You should consider your side and not blame the teachers and the school. If you think that your child is sitting there without a meal, why would you let your child fall into that situation? “a parent in the class group spoke up.
After being posted on social networks, the story “created waves” of public opinion with many heated debates. Many people criticize mothers for not paying 100,000 VND so their children can have fun with friends. In the class there were 32 students, 31 parents paid, only one parent did not pay even though they knew the party plan in advance, it was the mother’s fault.
However, many people also criticized teachers and parents for letting a child sit and watch their classmates eat as being cruel and asked the education sector to verify and clarify whether or not the incident was “accused” by parents online. society. If the truth is not so, it needs to be clarified to restore the prestige, honor and professional conscience of teachers.