Based on many extenuating circumstances of the defendants, the Procuracy proposed that the jury sentence Tran Van Sy from 24 months – 30 months in prison, and Han Ni from 18 months – 24 months in prison.
On March 1, the representative of the Ho Chi Minh City People’s Procuracy raised the opinion of impeachment and proposed sentencing for defendants Dang Thi Han Ni and Tran Van Sy on charges of abusing democratic freedoms to infringe upon the interests of the government. country, legitimate rights and interests of organizations and individuals.
The representative of the Procuracy said that based on many extenuating circumstances of the defendants, he recommended that the jury sentence Mr. Tran Van Sy from 24 months – 30 months in prison, and Han Ni from 18 months – 24 years in prison.
According to the Procuracy representative, the defendants’ actions had a negative impact on security and order. At today’s trial, he was made aware of the crime.
Defendant Han Ni at trial. (Photo: Hai Long)
According to the Procuracy, the defendants’ actions are dangerous to society and negatively affect social security, so strict sentences are needed to deter and educate. In particular, in this case, the people involved are Ms. Nguyen Phuong Hang and her husband and Dai Nam Company is known to many people.
In the impeachment section, the Procuracy stated that based on the expert’s conclusions and the defendants’ testimony admitting their criminal acts in court, there is enough basis to confirm that the indictment against the defendants is the right person, the right crime, and the right frame. penalty.
According to the indictment, from September 2021 to February 2022, Tran Van Sy used the YouTube account “Lawyer Tran Van Sy”; Dang Thi Han Ni uses the YouTube and Facebook accounts “Journalist Han Ni” to post articles, organize many recording sessions to broadcast on cyberspace, and state fabricated content, knowing clearly that the information is untrue or Unverified information that seriously offends personal reputation and honor.
These two people also posted information on the cyberspace about personal secrets, family secrets and private life of Mr. Huynh Uy Dung (61 years old, Chairman of the Board of Directors of Dai Nam Joint Stock Company) and Nguyen Phuong Hang (61 years old, Chairman of the Board of Directors of Dai Nam Joint Stock Company) and Nguyen Phuong Hang (61 years old, Chairman of the Board of Directors of Dai Nam Joint Stock Company). General Director of Dai Nam Joint Stock Company) against the law, affecting Dai Nam Joint Stock Company and Hang Huu Charity Fund (founded by Mr. Dung and Ms. Hang)
Therefore, Ms. Nguyen Phuong Hang filed a complaint and sent it to the authorities for resolution according to their authority.
Investigation results showed that Ms. Dang Thi Han Ni used a Facebook account and a YouTube account named “Journalist Han Ni” to broadcast a recording titled “Does Ms. Hang have the legal right to squat?” .
According to the conclusion, Ms. Dang Thi Han Ni posted information on personal secrets, family secrets, and other people’s private lives in cyberspace against the law, violating Point d, Clause 1, Article 17. Cyber Security Law.
At the investigation agency, Han Ni admitted that the reason for the statements related to Ms. Nguyen Phuong Hang was because Ms. Hang had insulting words about Han Ni when speaking live online on September 3. /2021.
Defendant Tran Van Sy used a YouTube account named “Lawyer Tran Van Sy” to broadcast many recordings to retort and insult Ms. Hang, Mr. Dung and Dai Nam Company…
