US Supreme Court upholds Biden’s deportation priorities

by worldysnews
4 comments

In a Landmark Ruling, Supreme Court Upholds Biden’s Deportation Priorities

In a majority ruling, the Supreme Court of the United States decided this Friday in favor of the Joe Biden government and maintained the deportation priorities set in 2021, focused on those undocumented individuals who have committed serious crimes.

States Lack Power to Challenge Federal Immigration Decisions

The highest court of justice, in response to a lawsuit filed by Texas and Louisiana, both governed by Republicans, ruled 8-1 that the states do not have the power to challenge such decisions made by the federal government when it comes to managing federal issues, such as immigration law.

Biden’s Priorities Aim to Enhance Security

The deportation priorities announced by Biden in 2021, shortly after taking control of the White House, prioritize national, public, and border security, targeting only those foreigners with serious criminal histories.

Plaintiffs Argue Government’s Failure to Enforce Deportation Orders

The plaintiffs had argued that the government was breaking the law by failing to arrest and remove any foreigner with a valid deportation order from the country.

Supreme Court Ruling Leaves Biden’s Hands Free

The sentence gives Biden an important victory against two Republican-governed states that fiercely oppose the president’s immigration policy, based on the recovery of immigration due process and dismantling the ‘zero tolerance’ immigration policy of former President Donald Trump.

The plaintiffs had argued that Biden’s deportation priorities, determined based on the reasonable use of available resources, conflicted with immigration law. But the Supreme Court said that the states did not have the standing or the power to sue.

“The ruling maintains prosecutorial discretion to implement certain aspects of immigration law. The government has the discretion to protect certain immigrants from deportation and not deport them immediately, freeze the cases or close them in the Immigration Court (EOIR),” said Alex Gálvez, an immigration attorney practicing in Los Angeles, California.

It is important to keep in mind that “the Biden administration never said that it was not going to deport any undocumented immigrant, but rather focused on those who have criminal records that threaten the security of the United States and Americans,” he added.

Gálvez further said that the Supreme Court’s 8-1 decision “is impressive.”

Data on Supreme Court’s Ruling on Biden’s Deportation Priorities

In the court’s opinion, Judge Kavanaugh wrote that the plaintiff states (Texas and Louisiana) had filed “an extraordinarily unusual claim.”

“They want a federal court to order the Executive Branch to modify its arrest policies to make more arrests. Federal courts have traditionally not considered that type of trial; in fact, the States do not cite precedents for a lawsuit like this,” explained the magistrate.

For his part, Justice Neil Gorsuch, along with Justices Clarence Thomas and Amy Coney Barrett, wrote a concurring opinion concluding that the states also lacked reasoning, but for reasons other than the majority opinion.

Judge Samuel Alito was the only one of the nine magistrates who dissented.

At the center of the legal battle was a memorandum from the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Alejandro Mayorkas, dated September 2021, where the government’s deportation priorities are established.

Unlike the previous government, which put 12 million undocumented immigrants on the deportation bench, Biden only focused on those with serious criminal records and who constitute a threat to the national and public security of the United States.

The Supreme Court Takes on the Case

In late November of last year, the Supreme Court began reviewing Biden’s deportation priorities. Four months earlier, in July, the highest court of justice did not allow the Administration to implement the new protocol announced at the end of September 2021, but the decision was frozen at the national level until the magistrates reviewed the policy.

Biden’s priorities replaced the priorities dictated by former President Trump, who, in addition to criminalizing undocumented stay, granted extraordinary powers to immigration agents to deport even foreigners accused of committing crimes and whose cases had not been resolved by the courts of justice.

The deportation priorities were sued by Texas and Louisiana, who claimed the government changed immigration law without authorization from Congress. Then-Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton argued that aliens with a final order of removal are criminals who should be removed from the country.

In the brief filed with the Supreme Court, the Texas attorney general’s office noted that “these categories of dangerous criminal aliens had initially been required to be detained” to address “increasing rates of criminal activity by aliens.”

Texas urged the Supreme Court to order the government to “detain criminal illegal aliens,” including all those with final orders of removal.

The Deportation Priorities Memorandum

At the end of September 2021, Mayorkas reiterated that being undocumented in the United States “does not condemn” the immigrant to be deported from the country.

In the document, sent to the security and border chiefs of the different agencies under his command, Mayorkas said that the fact that someone is an undocumented immigrant “should not be the only basis” for the decision to detain and expel them from the United States.

“We set civil immigration enforcement priorities to achieve our objectives in the most effective manner with the resources we have,” the document read.

Mayorkas wrote that “we will prioritize the detention and removal of non-citizens who are a threat to our national security, public safety, and border security.” The Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has instructed Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents that they should not attempt to arrest and deport farmworkers, the elderly, and others who were vulnerable to deportation under the Trump administration.

During the Trump administration, DHS relied on a harsh deportation priority list that included immigrants accused of crimes, even if the cases had not yet been decided by the courts.

Trump also decreed that the undocumented presence constituted a threat to national and public security and granted extraordinary powers to immigration agents to deport undocumented immigrants solely for the fact that they did not have legal permission to stay in the country.

Biden’s Deportation Priorities

The Supreme Court of the United States upheld President Joe Biden’s deportation priorities in a landmark ruling. The priorities, which focus on undocumented individuals who have committed serious crimes, aim to enhance national, public, and border security. The Court ruled 8-1 that states lack the power to challenge federal immigration decisions, responding to a lawsuit filed by Texas and Louisiana. The states argued that the government was breaking the law by not enforcing deportation orders. However, the Court determined that the states did not have standing or the power to sue. The ruling gives Biden a victory against two Republican-governed states that oppose his immigration policy. The decision allows the Biden administration to exercise prosecutorial discretion in implementing immigration law. The Court’s ruling was seen as impressive by immigration attorneys. Judge Kavanaugh noted that the lawsuit was an extraordinary claim, as it sought to order the Executive Branch to modify arrest policies to make more arrests. Justice Neil Gorsuch, along with Justices Clarence Thomas and Amy Coney Barrett, wrote a concurring opinion, while Judge Samuel Alito dissented. The legal battle centered around a memorandum from the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security that established the government’s deportation priorities. The Court began reviewing Biden’s priorities in November 2021. The priorities replaced those set by former President Donald Trump, who granted extraordinary powers to immigration agents to deport foreign nationals even before their cases had been resolved by the courts. Texas and Louisiana argued that the government had changed immigration law without authorization from Congress.

What were the arguments made by Texas and Louisiana in their lawsuit against the Biden administration’s deportation priorities, and why did the Supreme Court ultimately rule against them

The states of Texas and Louisiana filed a lawsuit against the Biden administration’s deportation priorities, arguing that they were violating federal immigration laws. The main arguments they made were:

1. Violation of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA): Texas and Louisiana claimed that the administration’s deportation memorandum violated the APA by not undergoing a proper review process and considering public input before implementing the new policies.

2. Endangering public safety: The states argued that the deportation priorities put in place by the Biden administration would put their citizens at risk by allowing certain undocumented immigrants, including those with criminal records, to remain in the country.

3. Financial burden: Texas and Louisiana contended that they would bear the financial burden of providing healthcare, education, and social services to undocumented immigrants who would be allowed to stay under the new deportation policies.

However, the Supreme Court ultimately ruled against Texas and Louisiana and declined to block the deportation priorities set by the Biden administration. The Court did not provide a detailed explanation for its decision, but it typically requires a showing of irreparable harm to grant emergency injunctive relief, which the states failed to demonstrate in this case. The ruling allowed the Biden administration to proceed with its deportation priorities while the broader legal challenges continue to be litigated.

You may also like

4 comments

Jonah June 23, 2023 - 4:12 pm

I believe the US Supreme Court’s decision to uphold Biden’s deportation priorities is a positive step towards a more humane immigration policy. It is important to prioritize those who pose a threat to national security while providing a fair chance for undocumented individuals who contribute positively to society.

Reply
Jesse June 23, 2023 - 4:12 pm

I believe this decision by the US Supreme Court to uphold Biden’s deportation priorities is a step towards a more humane and fair treatment of immigrants. It reinforces the administration’s commitment to prioritize national security while also prioritizing the wellbeing of families.

Reply
The Supreme Court Upholds Biden's Deportation Policy: Prioritizing the Removal of High-Risk Immigrants - Worldys News June 23, 2023 - 8:12 pm

[…] who delivered the ruling, criticized the states’ lawsuit, stating, “States have filed an extraordinarily unusual lawsuit. They want a federal court to order the executive branch to change their arrest policies to […]

Reply
The deportation priorities of the Joe Biden administration upheld by the Supreme Court - Worldys News June 23, 2023 - 11:11 pm

[…] set civil immigration enforcement priorities to achieve our objectives in the most effective manner with the resources we have,” he […]

Reply

Leave a Comment

Hosted by Byohosting – Most Recommended Web Hosting – for complains, abuse, advertising contact: o f f i c e @byohosting.com