Defendant Do Hoang Viet – son of the owner of Tan Hoang Minh Group admitted that the indictment against the defendant was correct.
On the morning of March 19, during questioning at the trial of Tan Hoang Minh case, most of the defendants admitted the charges.
As the first person to answer the jury’s interrogation, defendant Do Hoang Viet (Deputy General Director of Tan Hoang Minh Company) said that he holds the position of Deputy General Director in charge of the Finance and Accounting Center of Tan Hoang Company. Minh, with the task of planning the enterprise’s annual financial plan.
The defendant admitted that the indictment against the defendant was correct and declared that in 2021, when the Covid-19 epidemic occurred, Tan Hoang Minh had difficulty raising capital, had credit difficulties, and had many debts. due but unable to borrow again. Therefore, the business had a meeting to discuss and plan to issue bonds to raise capital.
According to Viet’s testimony, the capital mobilization policy came from Chairman Do Anh Dung. The Chairman assigned defendant Viet to come up with a plan and report back.
According to the testimony of Do Hoang Viet, three companies Bao Viet, Soleil and Winter Palace fabricated bogus business activities between the companies as a plan to issue individual bond packages with a total price. issuance value of 10,030 billion VND to raise money for the group.
The defendant himself directed his subordinates to choose a bond issuance company and contact an auditing company for a financial audit with the aim of a full audit.
In addition, the defendant also directed the signing of a “fake” contract to transfer bonds, running “false” cash flow for Tan Hoang Minh Company to become a primary bondholder to sell bonds, mobilize and appropriate money from investors. secondary buyers.
The jury heard the case of Tan Hoang Minh. Photo: CTV
In court, Viet admitted that the Tan Hoang Minh bond packages sold to investors did not guarantee value. During the process of selling and collecting bonds, the defendant reported to the Chairman. At that time, the defendant thought that Mr. Do Anh Dung did not know that it was a fraudulent act.
In this case, the damage was determined to be more than 8,643 billion VND, with more than 6,630 victims. Defendant Viet admitted this number and said that up to now, the family has recovered all the damages.
According to the allegation, before each bond issuance, Do Hoang Viet reported and received the consent of Do Anh Dung to direct Mr. Phung The Tinh (former Director of Finance and Accounting of Tan Hoang Minh), Hoang Quyet Chien (former acting Deputy Director of the Center for Finance and Accounting, cum Director of the Finance – Accounting Department of Tan Hoang Minh Hotel Trading and Services Co., Ltd.) is responsible for reviewing the financial situation of the selected companies. release Stock.
Defendant Viet also assigned the company’s chief accountants and accountants at the Center for Finance and Accounting to work with the auditing company to validate the financial statements with full approval and qualified opinions. Operate and organize “empty” cash flow to create “virtual” value of bonds, legally pay for primary bond transfer contracts and bond issuance plans.
Viet directed defendants Le Thi Mai (former Deputy Director of the Capital Resources Department, Tan Hoang Minh Hotel Trading and Services Co., Ltd.) and Vu Le Van Anh (former Deputy Director of the Capital Resources Department, Tan Hoang Minh Hotel Trading and Services Co., Ltd.) Hoang Minh) is responsible for assigning department leaders and specialists in the Capital Mobilization Department and the Capital Resources Department to create documents and “fake” issuance plans among companies and individuals within Tan Hoang Minh Group, Work and agree on related procedures with units providing price appraisal services, issuance consulting, account management and bond collateral management.
During questioning in court, the defendants Mai, Van Anh, and Tinh all admitted the charges. The defendants admitted that they knew they were wrong and still did it because they didn’t think it would cause such great consequences.
Defendant Chien specifically said that some of the prosecution’s contents were incorrect. According to the defendant, he did not know all about the business’s financial difficulties, because by the time the defendant accepted the position of Deputy Director of the Finance and Accounting Center, Tan Hoang Minh had already deployed 4 bond packages.
The defendant himself is just a salaryman and does not receive any benefits. When the incident happened, Tan Hoang Minh repaired all the damages, but the defendant still paid additional money to overcome the consequences of the case.
This afternoon the trial continues with questioning.
