Juventus had the superiority in the first minutes of the match, but without causing substantial problems in Eindhoven’s defense.
Wea was active on the right side. He worked in the 4th with Gonzalez, but shot Benites. In the 7th the American – who fought as a right back – returned to the area but the Dutch goalkeeper kicked the ball. Benites removed Nikos Gonzalez’s shot at 16΄.
The Dutch were playing conservatives, but paid it in the 34th minute. Juventus continued to push high and Gati became the ball after Ferman’s wrong removal. The Italian stopper made the shot in the heart of the area, Colo Muani was unable to defeat the Benites, but in the course of the phase, but Gati paved his chest to McKeni and he opened the scoring for the “Bianconeri” with a “thunderbolt”.
Gonzalez’s header in the 40΄ ended up in Benite’s lap, while a shot from Souten on Eindhoven went out in the last good time of the first half.
Juventus had the superiority at the start of the second 45 minutes and threatened for the first time in the 51΄, when after a cross from the right, Ebangula took the shot, but Benites kicked a corner.
Against the flow of the game and virtually its first good time in the game, Eindhoven managed to find the goal of the equalizer with Pericic (56΄). Lang avoided three Juventus players, found space shooting, the ball against Locatelli, Pericic was recipient, pretending to Kelly and sent the ball to the left corner of Di Gregorio for 1-1. The Italians complained about Lang’s hand at the beginning of the phase, but the goal was checked by VAR and measured normally.
Juve was taken aback by the unexpected equilibrium and saw the time rolling without being able to threaten the Dutch outbreak. But Ebanangula gave the solution to the “big lady”. In the 82΄ after Conceisao’s fine action from the right and the Benite’s rebound, the Belgian striker took the rebound and scored 2-1 for Juventus.
The Bianconeri took the victory and the lead in qualifying for the Champions League ’16, ahead of the Dutch rematch.
PLAYER KEY:
Ebanangula was the one who made the difference. Juventus was taken aback after the unexpected goal he received from Pericic at 56΄. She saw the time rolling without actually threatening the Dutch until the Belgian striker came in the 82΄ to give her the victory. It came in as a change to 46΄ and it was the one who judged the end result.
Change the match:
Ebanangula may have judged the final result, but Pericic’s (56΄) goal changed the game data. Until that point, Eindhoven had no suspicion of phase. It was essentially her first good time, which was transformed into a goal. He put her back into the game, but in the finale he bent over from the upper Juventus.
The worst of the stadium:
There was no negative protagonist in the game. If something was a negative impression, this was Eindhoven’s conservative game that was sufficient for a passive role and paid it in the finale, with Embangoula scoring the winning goal for Juventus.
The arbitration:
The most difficult phase that Daniel Simbert had to manage was the goal of Eindhoven’s equalizer. Juventus asked Lang at the beginning of the phase but the German referee thought the ball had found a shoulder, with VAR agreeing with him, so the Dutch goal was normally counted.
VAR-ASSOCIATION:
VAR controlled Eindhoven’s equalizer goal for Lang’s hand at the beginning of the phase. He did not see any infringement and so he did not have to call on Sibert to check that goal too.
SCORER:
34΄ Makeni, 56΄ Pericles, 82΄ Ebanangula
Eleven:
Juventus: Di Gregory, Guea, Gati, Vega, Kelly, Locateli (Tiram 68΄), Louise, Gonzalez (Conceisao 58΄), MacKeni (Copiners 68΄), Yardiz (Ebangula 46΄)
Eindhofen: Benites, Ledema, Flamingo, Obisco, Junior, Saimbari (Till 72΄), Souten, Ferman, Pericic, De Jong, Lang (Bakayoko 72΄)
NEXT GAME:
19/2 Eindhoven – Juventus 22:00
#soul #mouth #Juventus #lead #Eindhoven