About a month after the meeting with Pashinyan Aliyev organized with the mediation of Germany as part of the Munich Security Conference, and then two to three weeks after the two-day Mirzoyan-Bayram talks held in Berlin within the framework of the same mediation, the Prime Minister of Armenia leaves for Tavush and declares that if the “Azerbaijani villages” are not returned without preconditions , in case of saying no to Azerbaijan’s demand, “a week later there will be a war”, in which Armenia will be left alone.
Certainly, many questions arise that directly relate to Nikol Pashinyan’s statements, their motives, the degree of manipulativeness, etc., but also questions that relate to the “new mediator”, Germany. After a long pause in the Armenian-Azerbaijani “visual” negotiations, Berlin undertook mediation to organize meetings, causing excitement among a significant part of the Armenian public, for example, that these meetings will contribute to the reduction of tension and the removal of war risks.
But, come and see, at least the statements of the Patriarch of Armenia speak of the complete opposite. he says that either we must agree to Baku’s terms and demands, or there will be a war in which we will be left alone. Several days have passed, but there has been no response, for example, from Germany, the mediator of the Munich and Berlin meetings.
Meanwhile, it would be very interesting and important to understand whether the topic that Nikol Pashinyan has opened at present was touched upon in Munich and Berlin, was it touched with the emphasis that Nikol Pashinyan raises, is Pashinyan exactly as a “continuation”? Are you raising them or were completely different issues discussed in those two meetings, there was a completely different atmosphere and mood, and it is unexpected and a surprise for official Berlin that two or three weeks later, Yerevan is making such emphasis at a high level and presenting such an example to the public of Armenia. dilemmas”.
#ArmenianAzerbaijani #mediator #Berlin #silent