The particular prosecutor is signed by way of Sarafov’s deputy –

Summer season of 2023 The “Denkov” cupboard is in energy, and the individuals within the governing meeting have agreed {that a} mechanism for investigating the manager prosecutor must be followed. The adjustments were voted, and with them must be solved a long-standing drawback – who can search an account of the manager prosecutor.

Up to now, the solution is no person. Even if officially there’s a choice of the Constitutional Court docket, consistent with which any rank-and-file prosecutor may just start up a case in opposition to his awesome, such can’t be discovered. Some way out of this loss of regulate will have to be discovered, and the leaders of GERB, PP-DB, with the improve of DPS declare that they have got an answer.

The bulk accredited adjustments consistent with which, in terms of suspected crimes dedicated by way of the pinnacle of the general public prosecution, the investigation shall be led by way of a specifically appointed pass judgement on for the aim. Briefly, he acquires the standing of a prosecutor and, in principle, is totally impartial from everybody, he has his personal crew that collects proof, at the foundation of which the Justice of the Peace after all makes a decision whether or not or no longer the manager prosecutor dedicated a criminal offense.

Autumn 2024 Borislav Sarafov, appearing as the manager prosecutor, submits paperwork for participation within the election of the following head of the state prosecution. Amongst them, there’s a curious reference – there aren’t any pending instances in opposition to the candidate, nor have any information of crimes dedicated by way of him been discovered. Signature – Daniela Taleva, appointed as a distinct prosecutor.

How and when those tests have been performed the general public didn’t perceive, and almost definitely by no means will. Particular prosecutor Taleva does no longer give statements or explanations about how the lawsuits evolved beneath her management. And when she is requested, she does no longer resolution. As a substitute, someone else does it – Sarafov’s deputy, Elena Karakasheva.

The particular prosecutor is sought after

Particular prosecutor Taleva has gave the impression in public just a few occasions. Even if she is an established prison pass judgement on, she isn’t common out of doors of judicial circles. In her uncommon experiences to the Preferrred Judicial Council (SJC), which elected her to this place, she said that investigations have been being performed in response to experiences in opposition to Sarafov. There’s no public details about their development, and their conclusions can also be judged from the file introduced by way of the manager prosecutor – there is not any information on dedicated crimes.

You’ll be able to’t simply touch the particular prosecutor. She has no indexed telephone quantity or electronic mail. Because of the specifics of his place, there is not any management to gather documentation. The alerts achieve her by the use of a circuitous path – they’re submitted to the Preferrred Court docket of Cassation, the place it’s determined whether or not there’s proof of a imaginable crime. The court docket then sends the fabrics to the particular prosecutor, who then makes a decision what to do with them.

Mediapool submitted a request beneath the Get entry to to Public Knowledge Act (APIA). With it, the decrees for the termination of the tests in opposition to Sarafov have been asked. The solution used to be that those paperwork may just no longer be supplied. What used to be the trail of the applying isn’t transparent, however it’s recognized that it used to be after all despatched to the Deputy Prosecutor Basic Elena Karakasheva.

Her signature is underneath the solution, which states that “the acts of the prosecutor, drawn up and saved at the instance of the execution of procedural movements within the investigation of explicit instances don’t fall throughout the scope of the FDSO“.

With this dry wording, any try to perceive the rest concerning the matter is blocked. And it is not find it irresistible’s no longer about publicly vital knowledge. If there are suspicions that the Lawyer Basic is eager about wrongdoing, however the tests have proven that this isn’t the case, that knowledge must be public, no longer hidden in more than a few drawers within the Courthouse with an evidence of what’s and what isn’t public knowledge. And it is extremely telling that requests associated with the paintings of the particular prosecutor Taleva are signed by way of the deputy leader prosecutor, who must be checked by way of the particular prosecutor. And the particular prosecutor is meant to be impartial.

What is understood?

Signals for the manager prosecutor’s investigation into more than a few instances were filed since remaining summer season. In June, as an example, the Preferrred Court docket of Cassation revealed a listing of 15 such instances. What’s their content material isn’t transparent, such information hasn’t ever been introduced.

A yr later, this is. in June 2024 the SJC used to be supplied with a file, consistent with which Taleva refused to open investigations on 5 experiences. In the similar file, additionally it is said that the inspection on the request of former High Minister Nikolay Denkov must be finished by way of mid-August. It used to be filed after the upheavals within the remaining days of remaining yr’s governing meeting.

It’s concerning the motion in “Mitnitsi”, all over which the previous head of the company, Petya Bankova, used to be arrested. She used to be accused of taking part in smuggling with a number of people. On the identical time, there have been claims that the then leader secretary of the Ministry of the Internal, Zhivko Kotsev, used to be additionally concerned on this tale. He resigned all of a sudden, then retracted it, explaining that he have been careworn.

Because of those allegations, Denkov reported to Taleva. In the meantime, Kotsev used to be formally charged within the case in opposition to Bankova. There’s no explicit building on this investigation, with the exception of for the discharge from custody of the previous head of customs, who grew to become out to have a significant oncological illness. Then again, the selective unencumber of proof into the general public area (images and testimony) all over pre-election occasions makes an impact.

Keep an eye on?

A yr and a part after the adoption of the so-called the Lawyer Basic’s regulate mechanism does no longer appear to have issues beneath regulate in any respect. Moderately, the impact is that one thing used to be performed on paper, however the truth is similar. There’s a particular prosecutor who neither needs to speak about his paintings nor resolution questions. There may be a process for opting for the following leader prosecutor. With one candidate.

#particular #prosecutor #signed #Sarafovs #deputy

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.