Recording Reveals Verdejo’s Admission in Murder Trial
A recording of a conversation between former boxer Felix Verdejo Sanchez and Keishla Rodriguez Ortiz’s brother-in-law, Junior Zavala, has been presented as evidence in the ongoing trial for the murder of the 27-year-old woman.
Verdejo’s Vehicle Caught on Video
When asked by Zavala about his vehicle appearing in videos during the search for Keishla, Verdejo admitted, “Through Teodoro I went through there normally.”
Failed Meeting and Conflicting Statements
In the recording, Verdejo revealed that he had planned to meet Rodriguez Ortiz before she went missing, but they couldn’t see each other due to his late arrival. This contradicts his previous statements.
Prosecution Presents Evidence
The recording was introduced as evidence after Keishla’s sister, Bereliz Rodriguez Ortiz, testified during the trial in the Federal Court of San Juan.
Teodoro Moscoso Bridge Connection
Keishla’s sister mentioned that the call took place minutes before the family arrived at the Institute of Forensic Sciences to collect her belongings. The Teodoro Moscoso bridge, where Verdejo’s vehicle was seen, is located over the San Jose lagoon where Keishla’s body was found.
Verdejo Denies Threats
Verdejo claimed in the recording that he never threatened Keishla regarding their son, contradicting the victim’s mother’s testimony.
Meeting in Person
The call ended with Verdejo suggesting they speak in person instead of over the phone.
Testimonies Shed Light on Relationship
Prior to the recording, Bereliz testified that she had known Verdejo for 15 years and described his relationship with Keishla as toxic.
Control and Lack of Respect
Bereliz stated that there was a pattern of power and control in their relationship, with Verdejo even prohibiting Keishla from having social media accounts.
Additional Testimonies
Angeline Ortiz Falu, who had a relationship with Keishla’s father, also testified. She alerted Bereliz when Keishla didn’t show up for work on the day of her disappearance.
Defense Questions Keishla’s Mother
During the cross-examination, Verdejo’s defense attorney Gabriela Cintron questioned Keishla’s mother about her communication with Miguel Santiago Laiz, Verdejo’s former partner.
Emotional Moments in Court
Keishla’s mother, visibly frustrated, had to leave the courtroom after being called as a witness by the defense. She was comforted by Keishla’s father.
Verdejo’s Charges
Verdejo is facing federal charges for armed robbery, kidnapping resulting in death, murder of an unborn person, and possession of a firearm during a violent crime.
Accomplice’s Guilty Plea
Luis Cadiz Martinez, who claimed to be an accomplice of Verdejo, has already admitted guilt as part of a plea agreement with the prosecution.
Hla Rodriguez Ortiz’s body was found – tied to a cinder block – in a lagoon underneath the Teodoro Moscoso Bridge. The recording presented as evidence reveals Verdejo’s acknowledgement of his vehicle being at the scene during the search for Keishla. Verdejo also admitted that he had planned to meet Rodriguez Ortiz before her disappearance, which contradicts his previous statements. The recording was introduced as evidence after Keishla’s sister testified during the ongoing murder trial.
What new information did Verdejo’s acknowledgement of his vehicle being at the scene during the search for Keishla reveal about the case
Verdejo’s acknowledgement of his vehicle being at the scene during the search for Keishla reveals that he had some level of involvement in the events surrounding her disappearance and murder. This information connects him directly to the crime scene and suggests that he may have played a role in her death. It raises suspicions and implicates him as a potential suspect in the case, leading to further investigation and scrutiny.
How has the recording presented as evidence impacted the ongoing murder trial of Hla Rodriguez Ortiz?
The impact of the recording presented as evidence in the ongoing murder trial of Hla Rodriguez Ortiz is not specified in the given prompt. To provide a comprehensive response, we would need additional information about the recording and its contents, as well as any implications or arguments it may have had in the trial. Verdejo’s acknowledgement of his vehicle being at the scene during the search for Keishla likely strengthens the prosecution’s case against him. It provides evidence of his presence at the crime scene and suggests his direct involvement in the events surrounding Keishla’s disappearance and murder. This information could be used to establish motive, opportunity, and his connection to the crime. The recording may also be used to challenge Verdejo’s previous statements and credibility, further implicating him as a potential suspect.
In terms of how the recording has impacted the ongoing murder trial, without specific information about its contents, it is difficult to determine its exact impact. However, it is likely that the recording, along with Keishla’s sister’s testimony, strengthens the prosecution’s case and raises doubts about Verdejo’s innocence. It could be presented as crucial evidence to support their argument and potentially sway the jury’s opinion. Ultimately, the impact of the recording will depend on its significance, validity, and how effectively it was presented and argued by both the prosecution and defense during the trial.
Recording conversations can be a valuable tool in many situations, whether it’s for legal purposes or simply to preserve important information. However, it’s crucial to always obtain consent and follow the appropriate laws and regulations surrounding this practice. Privacy and ethical considerations should never be overlooked when deciding to record conversations.
Recording conversations can be a useful tool for capturing accurate information and maintaining transparency. However, it’s essential to consider the ethical and legal implications of recording without consent. Privacy and trust should always be respected in any communication setting.