Red Madre Foundation has crossed out “scandal» the endorsement of constitutional Court to the Government’s abortion reform allows minors aged 16 and 17 to terminate pregnancies without parental permission. Furthermore, he has pointed out that causes them “great pain”.
This has been stated by the general director of the Red Madre Foundation, Amaya Azconawho also regretted that, after this ruling, pregnant women under 18 and over 16 they are left “unprotected” in front of “adult individuals”which has pointed out that they can “hide” crimes of a sexual nature.
«It is a scandal and it causes us great pain to know that After this ruling, pregnant women under 18 and over 16 are left unprotected against adult individuals, who can hide crimes of a sexual nature, inducing or coercing said minors to abort,” he stated.
NEOS Foundation charges against the Government
For its part, the NEOS Foundation has pointed out that the Constitutional Court (TC) It is “an instrument in the hands of the Government”, after the endorsement of the reform that allows minors aged 16 and 17 to abort without parental permission.
«Once again, it is confirmed that the Constitutional Court is essentially an instrument in the hands of the Government, at the service of its project and its interests”he assured, adding that he welcomes the sentence “with deep sadness” but “without any surprise.”
In this sense, the former Minister of the Interior, president of the CEU Royal University Institute of European Studies and promoter of NEOS, Jaime Mayor Oreja, has said that to the TC «They neither care about life nor are they aware of the nonsense that, with this sentence, they carry out«.
Likewise, Neos has added that the magistrates who currently make up the “badly called progressive” majority of the guarantee court “They do not hesitate to transfer the functions attributed to the court to become a legislative body or a court of cassation, as the occasion requires.«.
«Once again, a clear statement from the Constitutional Court is missing in defense of the right to life, clearly enshrined in the Carta Magna and in countless international treaties signed by Spain,” he noted.
Along these same lines, he added that this “use” of the institution “brings discredit before Spanish society to the magistrates who bow to the designs of the government and to the institution itself» who has accused of wearing “proud” the “road dust lamps.”
“We cannot expect any approach based on the defense of the constitutional spirit from this court, which will go down in history as the court that was at the service of a government project,” he concluded.