ONPE report reveals how Corvetto was shielded by Susel ParedesONPE report reveals how Corvetto was shielded by Susel Paredes

New revelations appear in the case of favoring that today’s congresswoman Slousy Paredes Piqué by the head of the ONPE, Piero Corvetto, who let a sanction against her expire when she was a candidate for mayor for the Magdalena district.

According to ONPE documents, Piero Corvetto Salinas learned on July 12, 2021 that Susel Paredes did not comply with presenting information on her income and expenses for running in the 2018 municipal elections, for which she should be fined 42,000 Suns.

However, Corvetto let time pass and spoke out only in April 2022, but to arrange for the case to be filed.

DOCUMENTS

Through report No. 032-2019-JAVC-SGVC-GSFP/ONPE of March 12, 2019, the ONPE details that 3,573 former candidates did not comply with presenting information on their income and expenses for appearing in the 2018 council elections.

Among those omitted was Susel Paredes Piqué, who was a candidate for mayor for the Magdalena district.

Given this, ONPE begins an administrative sanctioning procedure against all former omitted candidates. In the case of Susel Paredes, it is formalized through Management Resolution No. 002971-2020-GSFP/ONPE of December 30, 2020.

This resolution is signed by Margarita María Díaz Picasso, then Manager of the Supervision Management of Party Funds.

NOTIFIED

After a few months, on July 12, 2021, Margarita Díaz Picasso sends Piero Corvetto the final investigation report of the administrative sanctioning procedure ERM 2018, against Susel Paredes.

Through report 001831-2021-GSFP/ONPE, it reports the sending of report 003761-JANRFP-SGTN-GSFP/ONPE, which I make mine in all its aspects, through which the final instruction report of the administrative sanctioning process is presented, followed against Susel Paredes, who did not present the financial information on contributions and income received and expenses incurred during the electoral campaign of the 2018 regional and municipal elections within the period established by law.

The report 003761-JANRFP-SGTN-GSFP/ONPE, submitted to Díaz Picasso by Víctor Vivanco Tagle, then head of the Regulatory Area for the Regulation of Party Finances, determines “in a motivated manner the infringing conduct that is considered proven, the norms that have been violated by the infraction and the corresponding sanction proposal and the rule that provides for it.”

ALLOWS OMISSION

In her defenses, presented in writing on January 14 and 15, 2021, Susel Paredes “acknowledges that she did not formally present the accountability and recognizes that as a candidate she had the responsibility of regularizing said omission, for which she requests to benefit from the reduction benefit.” of sanctions (…) He has no excuse for why he did not formally present accountability in the ERM 2028.”

Susel Paredes’ admission of guilt is considered by the ONPE as a mitigating circumstance, so, although the amount of the fine is determined at 20 UIT, a 50% reduction is applied for “recognition of responsibility”, which means that the fine was reduced to 10 UIT.

Taking into account that the UIT for 2019 was S/ 4,200, “the amount of the penalty would be 20 UIT or S/ 84,000, corresponding to a 50% reduction of said amount, this is up to 10 UIT or S/ / 42,000”.

For all the above, this final report determines the “infringing conduct that is considered proven: it is proven that the company did not comply with presenting the financial information on contributions/income and expenses of the ERM 2018 electoral campaign, within the established legal deadline.” .

Likewise, it establishes that “a fine of 10 UIT or S/ 42,000 must be imposed.” And this is what he points out in his conclusion.

INACTION

The forceful report, as already noted, reached the hands of Piero Corvetto on July 12, 2021, sent by Margarita Díaz Picasso. However, Corvetto took no action and let time pass until the sanction expired.

Only on April 21, 2022, the head of the ONPE signs Chief Resolution No. 001482-2022-JN/ONPE, where he decides to archive the sanctioning procedure followed against Susel Paredes Piqué, and thus no longer collect the fine of 42,000 soles .

The arguments that supported the filing are what is indicated in paragraph 2 of article 259 of the Single Ordered Text of Law No. 27444, which establishes that “Once the maximum period for resolution has elapsed, without notification of the respective resolution, it is automatically understood to have expired administratively. the procedure and it will be filed.”

WAITING

This medium is still waiting for statements from Susel Paredes and Piero Corvetto, who to date have not responded to our interview requests.