When the Procuracy requested the Court docket of Enchantment to uphold the dying sentence, Ms. Truong My Lan defended herself and mentioned she sought after to reside to triumph over the results.
Like Newspaper It used to be reported that on November 15, on the enchantment court docket section 1 of the Van Thinh Phat case, the consultant of the Procuracy requested the appellate panel to uphold the dying sentence of Ms. Truong My Lan (Chairman of Van Thinh Phat Workforce). ) for three crimes (through which the crime of “Belongings Embezzlement” used to be really useful for the dying penalty).
Right away after the Procuracy mentioned its opinion on resolving the case, the jury allowed Ms. Truong My Lan to shield herself.
Ahead of the jury, Ms. Truong My Lan mentioned that she used to be deeply acutely aware of her wrongdoing, so she didn’t whinge, however simplest requested the appellate panel to imagine decreasing her sentence.
“If we are living, we will be able to be able to proceed overcoming the results, and we will be able to have a method to revive unfinished tasks” – Ms. Truong My Lan offered.
After Ms. Lan’s self-defense, attorney Nguyen Thi Huyen Trang (Ho Chi Minh Town Bar Affiliation) defended Ms. Lan pronouncing that, on this case, the violations are divided into 2 phases, level 1 from From 2012 to prior to January 1, 2018, Ms. Lan used to be convicted of violating credit score and banking actions. Segment 2 used to be convicted of embezzling property within the non-public financial sector. “So it may be noticed that, with the similar habits, with the similar awareness all over from 2012 till the prosecution, Ms. Lan used to be prosecuted for 2 crimes” – Legal professional Huyen Trang mentioned.
Legal professional Nguyen Thi Huyen Trang, protecting Ms. Truong My Lan on the trial lately, November 15. Picture: Tan Chau.
Additionally in keeping with attorney Huyen Trang, that is the primary belongings embezzlement case within the non-public sector to be investigated, prosecuted, attempted and sentenced to dying. The case is especially huge in scale, with many individuals, together with within the non-public and public sectors. Then again, all over the investigation, prosecution and trial procedure, Ms. Lan all the time approved accountability for the results and used to be chargeable for repairing all damages, by no means blaming any defendant.
Legal professional Huyen Trang analyzed that Ms. Lan’s legal habits stemmed from natural trade actions. The info within the case additionally proved that the amount of cash embezzled from Ms. Lan’s property used to be used to perform SBC Financial institution (greater than 183,000 billion VND); create trade actual property property in Vietnam; bills to home organizations and folks of greater than (50,000 billion VND); Go-border cash switch additionally proved that the amount of cash the defendant transferred into Vietnam used to be time and again greater than the amount of cash the defendant transferred out of Vietnam (transferred out of Vietnam used to be 1.5 billion USD and transferred into Vietnam used to be greater than 1.5 billion USD). 3 billion US greenbacks).
Legal professionals on the trial lately, November 15. Picture: Tan Chau.
Legal professional Huyen Trang additionally mentioned that, for the reason that first example trial, even though she used to be sentenced to dying, Ms. Lan has all the time proactively repaired the wear to all the case. If truth be told, defendant Lan additionally proactively gave all property of the defendant and his friends and family to mend the issue with out abdicating accountability.
“If we quickly settle for the valuation worth to match the numbers, the worth of Ms. Lan’s property to triumph over the results is sufficient to meet the appliance of Level b, Clause 1, Article 51 of the 2015 Penal Code. As well as, Ms. Lan additionally has the Medal of Honor. Exertions; 31 Benefit and different mitigating instances. In line with the above research, I respectfully request that the Procuracy settle for the protection viewpoint of the attorney and re-conclude the dying penalty for the crime of embezzlement, decreasing the penalty from dying to existence imprisonment. Combining the consequences for the crimes, defendant Lan’s sentence is existence imprisonment” – Legal professional Nguyen Thi Huyen Trang ‘concluded’ the protection.