A video shared through the presenter Ilkin Hasani led to discussions. Within the video he shared addressing the police government, he requested for a effective for the driving force who threw the cigarette butt from his automobile at the street:
“As I described, I even have grievance. Please, in line with this symbol, effective the driving force 300 manats for dumping tobacco waste into the surroundings and tell me in regards to the effective.”
It will have to be famous that consistent with the proposed exchange to the Code of Administrative Offenses, the volume of the effective for dumping tobacco waste into the surroundings is higher from 50 manats to 300 manats. supply
On the identical time, if the one that won an administrative sanction commits the required offense once more inside of 365 days from the date of access into pressure of the executive sanction choice, this time a effective of 700 manats is imposed, or relying at the instances of the case, 60 to 100 hours of group carrier is implemented, taking into consideration the identification of the culprit.
It will have to be famous that the presenter Ilkin Hasani “effective the driving force AZN 300 and tell me in regards to the effective” made a mistake with the crucial. Thus, the proposed modification to the Code of Administrative Offenses, which was once mentioned on the assembly of the Milli Majlis on October 8, 2024 has been authorised within the first studying for now.
Declare: The legislation “On non-public knowledge” has been violated
There are claims that the legislation of the Republic of Azerbaijan “On Private Data” has been violated through sharing. In keeping with the allegations, the quantity plate of the automobile is non-public knowledge, with this quantity it’s imaginable to decide the identification of the individual. Subsequently, the presenter will have to now not have disseminated the tips he noticed and filmed, however will have to have simply knowledgeable the police. Even though the logo of the automobile identifies its proprietor, as an example, if this is a uncommon logo, then there are those that suppose that its photographs will have to now not be printed.
(registration code of the automobile is hidden through us)
Those that imagine that this video lets in direct or oblique id of an individual imagine that it’s mediain addition to disclosure thru knowledge methods or making it imaginable for people to get conversant in non-public knowledge in some other approach, that the legislation Creates duty with Article 2.1.12.
Via legislation, assortment and processing of private knowledge can also be performed best underneath sure prerequisites. As an example, the gathering and processing in their knowledge could also be allowed when the individual offers his consent, when those knowledge are open classes, or when non-public knowledge is processed in line with the law that defines the needs and strategies in their assortment and processing.
In keeping with the declare, such information will have to now not be recorded and shared, however will have to be despatched to legislation enforcement companies.
“The person who unfold the tips will have to now not best be held accountable, however will have to be rewarded”
Former police officer, lieutenant colonel Surkhay Jafarov Faktyokhla advised Lab that the one that gave the tips isn’t just held accountable, however the one that gave the tips is rewarded with 60 manats. In keeping with him, at the eve of the COP29 occasions, which will probably be attended through many representatives from the majority of the nations of the sector, within the 12 months of “Unity for a Inexperienced Global” in our nation, everybody will have to combat in opposition to those that muddle the ambience and the earth: “After the brand new legislation comes into pressure, those that throw waste from the automobile will probably be fined 200 manats, and people who throw away cigarettes will probably be fined 300 manats. will probably be fined within the quantity of
S. Jafarov additionally expressed his opinion on giving the tips to the police from social accounts: “There is not any non-public knowledge within the sharing. The auto will not be the topic’s personal automobile.”
Auto knowledgeable Elmeddin Muradli additionally disagreed with the claims.
Publika.az experiences that he mentioned in his observation to Faktyokhla Lab that the one level wherein the presenter Ilkin Hasani’s request is unjust is the volume of the effective: “The top of the rustic has discussed it again and again in his speech. If we means the problem in line with the legislation on public keep watch over and public participation, that is totally customary. In many nations of the sector, problems are regulated on this approach. A citizen is aware of that if he commits a unfavourable motion, he’ll be punished through the voters prior to the police. We don’t deal with it correctly. Public condemnation is directed in the wrong way. Those that take steps in opposition to the unfavourable motion grow to be the article of grievance, flip the topic into a non-public drawback, put power on that particular person, insult them with side road phrases similar to “employer”.
E. Muradli mentioned that the driving force’s habits is a contravention of public laws, now not non-public knowledge: “He made a gross mistake, littered the road, and I see no drawback in sharing it. A person commits a legal act in the street, will have to we ask him for permission to proportion that you’re breaking the legislation? This technique of preventing them is efficacious. Now not best do I now not condemn, to the contrary, as a consultant of the general public, I name on everybody to be energetic.”
In regards to the disclosure of his identification, E. Muradli says that during such circumstances, the names of the individuals will have to be disclosed in order that they’re ashamed.
The issue may well be when…
In keeping with Arshad Huseynov, director of the “Digesta” legislation company, non-public knowledge is other: “Private knowledge is other. As an example, title, surname, patronymic are open non-public knowledge and it’s not an issue to proportion it. Permission is needed to file and distribute pictures, movies, and sounds.
The state registration plate of the automobile is visual within the mentioned publish, and the state registration mark is coded knowledge. Simplest state government know who’s underneath this code, it’s not public knowledge. No person is aware of who’s riding the automobile with the quantity, and which authority’s automobile it’s. This is, there was once no drawback with the selection of the automobile showing within the video. The issue may well be when the individual’s face is visual and the voice is recorded. On this case, there generally is a query of any legal responsibility, similar to non-public knowledge allotted with out his permission. Or, it could be a contravention of the presumption of innocence if the individual whose photograph or video is shared is accused of a few unlawful act, crime. There is not any severe violation of legislation within the distribution of pictures and movies on this approach. however it is higher such knowledge will have to now not be disseminated, however will have to be despatched immediately to the state government”.
End result:
– The legislation of the Republic of Azerbaijan “On non-public knowledge” has now not been violated;
– Mavens imagine that the video broadcast through the presenter Ilkin Hasani does now not include non-public knowledge and the necessities of the Regulation of the Republic of Azerbaijan “On Private Data” have now not been violated. Identify, surname, patronymic don’t seem to be confidential knowledge. Within the distribution of private knowledge, permission is needed if the individual’s face is visual and the voice is recorded;
– In spite of everything, it’s higher that such knowledge isn’t disseminated and despatched immediately to the state government.
#presenter #Ilkin #Hasani #wreck #legislation #sharing #video