Bennis rejects the rift between the 2 “intellectuals”

Researcher Saeed Bennis seen a “hectic courting” these days between what he referred to as the “classical highbrow” and the “virtual highbrow,” including that “either one of them are living in a global other from the opposite; The primary considers that the digital international is a pointless international, and that affect on society comes via a tradition that will depend on writing and running a blog in vintage helps, similar to newspapers and books, and that digital websites are useless and don’t have any have an effect on on genuine societal dynamics.”

The results of this 2d belief is that the semblance of “classical” intellectuals within the “digital international,” consistent with Bennis, is “a modest and uncommon look,” against this to “the ever present virtual highbrow, who’s to be had on an account, a wall, a web page, and a channel, interacting day-to-day and negotiating in a well timed way about all societal issues.” He considers that his function has change into a pivotal function in neighborhood lifestyles.”

That is what made the presence of the “virtual highbrow,” consistent with the researcher’s paper, “generally tend towards virtual habit, consistent surveillance, and real-time statement.”

Clear of this “instant statement” and steady tracking, “the classical highbrow waits till he collects the information, examines the knowledge, and grasps the topic from all angles, to select the best and efficient manner, with a purpose to produce paintings this is novel and helpful.” Subsequently, “nearly all of classical intellectuals believe that what’s produced within the digital is superficial, with out highbrow intensity, and is the made from fleeting interactions.”

Saeed Bennis talked a few 3rd form of highbrow, situated “between the classical highbrow and the virtual highbrow,” and he referred to as him “the classical virtual highbrow.” He’s “that highbrow who offers with the digital international with the similar private preparation and highbrow program by which he’s lively within the classical helps; He writes, publishes, stocks, and stocks purpose weblog posts and clinical texts in which he does no longer goal to assemble “likes,” monetary benefit, or beg for fans, however reasonably targets to teach the digital neighborhood and right kind some flawed concepts.”

This “3rd form of highbrow” works to “make the digital international a global that may shape a bridge for stream and negotiation of certain concepts, tendencies, and values ​​that appreciate cultures and variations, and steer clear of making the digital house an area for hate speech, a tradition of violence, the fluidity of triviality, and digital wars.” In step with the similar analysis.

The researcher defends the significance of this 3rd form of highbrow, who’s concerned “via his orientations, viewpoint, and classical philosophy, in a brand new, reworked international that adopts virtual algorithms, digital communism, and virtual isolation,” in a cultural act inside the “digital house.” “It breaks the rift between the classical highbrow and the virtual highbrow, and constitutes a brand new transgression and problem to this twin polarity.”