Defendant Truong My Lan denied directing SCB leaders to spend cash for private functions and mentioned that the defendants’ statements weren’t improper however may just simply be deceptive.
On September 25, after wondering subordinate defendants associated with the Van Thinh Phat case section 2 on cash laundering, the panel puzzled defendant Truong My Lan.
Presenting in court docket, defendant Truong My Lan mentioned she revered the testimony of the former defendants, however sought after to be additional defined on some problems.
In regards to the accusation of being answerable for cash laundering with an quantity of greater than 445,000 billion VND, defendant Lan affirmed that throughout the ten years, he most effective carried out the acts as said in section 1 of the case. Alternatively, in section 2, at the side of that act and the amount of cash, the defendant used to be charged with an extra crime, so he was hoping the panel of judges would assessment the costs in opposition to him.
The panel requested defendant Truong My Lan what the aim of the greater than 445,000 billion VND used to be. Defendant Lan responded that she didn’t use this quantity. Alternatively, the indictment discussed 75 billion VND, this used to be a mortgage due and used to be mechanically restructured by way of SCB.
Pass judgement on: So is the amount of cash transferred in another country so much?
Defendant Lan mentioned that the cash transferred in another country used to be very small in comparison to the amount of cash transferred from in another country to Vietnam. She additionally denied directing the SCB financial institution’s leaders to spend cash for private functions. In keeping with her, the statements of the opposite defendants weren’t improper however had been simply deceptive, making her state of affairs extra sophisticated. She affirmed that the cash dispensed from SCB Financial institution used to be basically to repay outdated loans.
When requested whether or not she used the cash to repay loans from different banks, defendant Lan affirmed that Van Thinh Phat didn’t borrow cash from different banks. She additionally affirmed that there used to be no non-public borrowing or any borrowing associated with Van Thinh Phat’s title.
Relating to the usage of bank cards, defendant Lan mentioned that she continuously lived in another country and basically used bank cards from overseas banks. At the moment, SCB Financial institution’s leaders begged her to open a bank card at SCB, so she agreed. When the cost cut-off date got here, defendant Lan affirmed that she at all times used her non-public cash to repay bank card money owed and didn’t use SCB’s cash to pay those quantities.
Prior to now, the panel puzzled defendant Tran Thi Hoang Uyen – Truong My Lan’s secretary about bank card bills.
Ms. Uyen mentioned that her major task used to be to lend a hand Ms. Lan with home tasks. As well as, the defendant used to be additionally answerable for tracking, managing and paying for the credit cards of Ms. Lan’s members of the family, together with the ones of Ms. Lan, her husband and her two daughters.
On the finish of every month, when the financial institution sends the observation to the corporate, the corporate will ahead it to the defendant in order that the spending isn’t late.
Defendant Uyen treated the small quantities, and for the huge quantities, she wrote a notice and despatched it to SCB. Uyen mentioned she didn’t stay a report of her bills and didn’t know the place the cash got here from.
As well as, defendant Uyen additionally immediately won cash from defendant Bui Van Dung – Truong My Lan’s motive force at Ms. Lan’s personal house.
In keeping with the accusation, since 2012, Ms. Tran Thi Hoang Uyen used to be assigned by way of Ms. Truong My Lan to obtain cash from Bui Van Dung and organize and pay bank cards for those who are family members and acquaintances of Ms. Lan.
Ms. Uyen obviously knew that Van Thinh Phat Workforce and SCB Financial institution had been each owned and operated by way of Truong My Lan, and that the cash she won from Bui Van Dung originated from SCB Financial institution.
From March 30, 2019 to August 17, 2022, Ms. Uyen won a complete of VND 5,824 billion from Bui Van Dung, this quantity is thought to have originated from Truong My Lan’s prison acts.
After receiving the cash, Ms. Uyen transferred it to different people as directed by way of Truong My Lan. As well as, Uyen continuously went to SCB Financial institution to signal paperwork and entire procedures to deposit cash into Visa and Grasp playing cards for Mr. Chu Lap Co with out if truth be told making the deposit, as directed by way of Truong My Lan.
The indictment accused Uyen of helping Truong My Lan in concealing and legalizing the volume of VND 5,824 billion that Ms. Lan appropriated throughout the crimes of embezzlement and fraud.
Hoang Tho