Journalist Uğur Dündar was once heard as a witness within the 10 million lira repayment case filed towards Akpınar by means of Duygu Nebioğlu, artist Metin Akpınar’s daughter from an extramarital affair. Dündar stated, “I discovered that Duygu Nebioğlu is Metin Akpınar’s daughter, with the newest information within the media, I would not have any details about it sooner than.”
Duygu Nebioğlu, the daughter of artist Metin Akpınar from his extramarital affair, filed a lawsuit towards the grasp actor for 10 million lira for repayment. The listening to of the case filed by means of Nebioğlu, by which Akpınar stated, “It was once my one-night stand, I did not know I had a kid,” persevered. Uğur Dündar was once heard as a witness within the repayment case at Akseki Civil Courtroom of First Example. Dündar, who got here to Beykoz Courthouse to testify upon directions, was once taken on the Beykoz 4th Civil Courtroom of First Example.
“I discovered that he had a daughter with the newest information within the media.”
Mentioning that he discovered from the inside track that Duygu Nebioğlu is Metin Akpınar’s daughter, Uğur Dündar stated, “I’ve discovered that Duygu Nebioğlu is Metin Akpınar’s daughter with the newest information within the media, I would not have any details about it sooner than, it’s been revealed in Hürriyet since 1986. I labored at his newspaper for 25 years, and I additionally labored at the workforce’s tv channels. Whilst I used to be operating at Hürriyet, I had no concept that Metin Akpınar had this sort of daughter. I used to be no longer acutely aware of it, and I additionally haven’t any knowledge {that a} information about this factor got here to Hürriyet Newspaper and it was once no longer revealed. If this sort of information had come, Çetin Emeç, who was once a press martyr at the moment, was once the Editor-in-Leader of Hürriyet Newspaper. If his brother’s identify was once discussed in such an incident, he would have had the honesty and braveness to submit it. ” he stated.
“No such information was once circulated within the newspaper.”
Dündar stated, “Any such information was once by no means circulated within the newspaper, and there was once an excellent pageant within the press at the moment. Let’s assume it got here to Hürriyet Newspaper and it was once no longer revealed, rival newspapers, as an example Sabah newspaper, may have simply revealed it, and but even so, I’ve by no means heard of such censorship in Hürriyet.” “It isn’t,” he stated. Mentioning that such information didn’t come to the newspaper in the ones years, Uğur Dündar stated, “As requested, I used to be operating as the manager reporter without delay reporting to Çetin Emeç in 1988-1989. After listening to about this incident, I additionally met with Uğur Cebeci, the intelligence leader and information director, and he additionally He showed me and stated that that they had by no means won such information in 1988-1989, there was once an Antalya Bureau of Hürriyet Newspaper. If I am not flawed, there was once additionally a Akdeniz complement. Antalya Bureau would submit it without delay within the Akdeniz complement. If the Akdeniz complement was once no longer on air at the moment, the inside track would come without delay to the intelligence leader, Uğur Cebeci, and from there it was once transferred to this board, which integrated the Editor-in-Leader. “They might evaluation the long run information themselves, and I’d attend this assembly once in a while. That is my wisdom and revel in,” he stated.
“The journalist who made the inside track at the moment served the inside track, nevertheless it was once no longer revealed.”
Plaintiff Duygu Nebioğlu’s attorney, Ahmet Furkan Uludağ, stated, “The defendant’s witness, Mr. Uğur Dündar, was once heard. In his remark, Uğur Bey said that the inside track despatched to him by means of Oktay Koltan from Antalya didn’t achieve them and that he had no wisdom of it. Then again, he’s the witness heard by means of us in Antalya. Oktay Koltan, Kemer correspondent on the time, said sooner than the court docket that he conveyed the inside track to Hürriyet Newspaper Common Directorate, however the information was once no longer revealed. “Akseki Civil Courtroom of First Example will make the overall resolution consistent with the contradictory statements of the witness,” he stated. – ISTANBUL
#Million #Greenback #Reimbursement #Case #Metin #Akpınar